I’d venture to say you have not finished reading every novel you began. Recall some that you laid aside. (Perhaps one or two are within arm’s reach, in which case you can review them to answer this question.) Why did you stop reading?
Perhaps you felt no sympathy for
the protagonist. Perhaps the author’s style was cumbersome. Perhaps a dozen
other reasons prompted you to snap the covers shut and put the book on your
garage-sale pile. Dean Koontz believes—and my experience bears this out—a
reader’s interest flags most often because there’s not enough action in the
story.
“The more movement you work into
your story and the more completely you avoid static scenes in which the
characters do nothing but talk at one another, the more likely you are to end up
with a novel that will sell,” Koontz says. “…Most readers just want to get on
with it.”[1]
Victorian readers tolerated lengthy
passages of setting description, philosophical reflection, and drawing-room
dialogue in which nothing happened. College professors still compel students to
read such books, or they would all be out of print. But these aren’t the sort
of books that today’s readers will buy with their hard-earned money or, if they
do by mistake, not the books in which they choose to invest a weekend.
We find plenty of tips and tricks
for writing engaging action sequences in Koontz’s book and elsewhere, but
notice a bit of his counsel that’s completely counterintuitive: Because an
action sequence is the most interesting part of a novel for modern readers, we
need to make the most of it. How? By making it longer.
We may speed up a reader’s
perception of such a passage by making it shorter, but that also disappoints.
Koontz advises, “Each time you write a potentially gripping chase—or fight or
whatever—in just one page or less, you are throwing away a golden opportunity
to seize and deeply involve your audience.”[2]
Here there’s a paradox. When we
want to convey speed, we naturally shorten what we write. Short sentences and
sentence fragments telegraph a sense of swift action; but if we do that, the
reader feels shortchanged. What’s the solution? Write a longer narrative. But
how can we do that without padding the story? Remember the secret of plotting:
Get the character in trouble, then make the trouble worse and worse!
For example, Koontz opens his novel
Whispers with a chase scene in which an assailant pursues a young woman
through a farmhouse. She takes refuge in one room after another, only to have
him find her again. She desperately tries to find a weapon (a flashlight? a
lamp?), only to have him dodge or deflect each one. He keeps gaining on her, even
grasping her clothes from time to time, but she manages to break free of his
grasp and keep running, while he growls and pursues her ever closer. This
breathless chase eventually reached 25 manuscript pages and more 7,500 words.
An action scene doesn’t have to be
a chase, of course. It could be a fight between two suitors, a vicious courtroom
argument, a child seeking shelter from a ferocious storm, etc. Any scene that
puts readers on the edge of their seats is worth prolonging, so don’t relieve
the tension too soon.
Great post! Especially as we're coming up on our meeting about Creating Compelling Scenes.
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts, Joe. I'm reminded of the advice to leave out the parts that people tend to skip. Indeed! I often wonder how readers of old waded through those long, boring passages in the literature of days gone by.
ReplyDelete