Last month I warned you
against using copyrighted material on the Internet without permission. But what
if you can’t get permission?
The copyright law allows
what it calls “fair use.” Unfortunately, it isn’t always easy to know what use
is fair.
The statute sets out
several factors for courts to consider, but it isn’t a simple mathematical
equation—just because you meet most of them doesn’t mean you win.* The courts
look at all the facts and circumstances in the case. In Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, the U.S.
Supreme Court found that a purported book review that used approximately 400
words from a 200,000 word manuscript violated the copyright.** For a more
detailed discussion of that case, read my July 23, 2013 Hoosier Ink post.
Still, by looking at the
statute and the cases together, it is possible to get a general idea of what
qualifies as fair use.
- Criticism
or comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research are often
fair use, although it may depend on how much of the original material is
borrowed. Fair use does not
usually allow a teacher to copy books, movies, or music for classroom use.
- If
the use is primarily commercial (e.g., you included the lyrics from a
copyrighted song in the novel you hope will become a bestseller), the
courts are less likely to find that it is a fair use than if the use is
for nonprofit educational purposes.
- The
courts also consider the nature of the copyrighted work. The courts are more
likely to find fair use for copying passages from a scientific text than
for paraphrasing material from a novel.
- If
you use a significant amount or a
defining aspect of the work, it is less likely to be a fair use. Those 400
words in the Nation Enterprises “book
review” were less than .1% of the manuscript, but they were the meatiest
parts.
- The
courts also look at how the use affects the potential market for or value
of the copyrighted work. If the use increases the copyright owner’s
profits, it is probably fair use. If it takes money out of the owner’s
pocket, it probably isn’t. For example, if you quote just enough to whet
your readers’ appetites and send them running to the bookstore to buy the
book, it is probably fair use (and the copyright owner is unlikely to
complain, anyway). If you photocopy an entire book and give it to someone
who might have bought it otherwise, it is unlikely to be a fair use. On
the other hand, a negative book review may turn away potential buyers, but
as long as it doesn’t use more of the text than is necessary to make its
point, it is still fair use.
Here is my personal rule
about using copyrighted material without permission: When in doubt, I don’t.
But if I’m confident that it’s a fair use, I don’t let the copyright bullies
talk me out of it.
Because that wouldn’t be
fair.
__________
* 17 U.S.C. § 107
describes the fair use factors.
** Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S.
539 (1985).
__________
Kathryn Page Camp is a
licensed attorney and full-time writer. Her most recent book, Writers in Wonderland: Keeping Your Words
Legal (KP/PK Publishing 2013), is a Kirkus’
Indie Books of the Month Selection. Kathryn is also the author of In God We Trust: How the Supreme Court’s
First Amendment Decisions Affect Organized Religion (FaithWalk Publishing
2006) and numerous articles. You can learn more about Kathryn at
www.kathrynpagecamp.com.
Good article, Kathryn. Very insightful.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jeff.
ReplyDelete