(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing, 2021)
News editor of Christianity
Today, the flagship magazine of American evangelicalism, Daniel Silliman
has given us a candid assessment of the movement, based on five blockbuster
books or book series. These crossover books are the public face of evangelical
Christianity for most secular readers. Silliman argues they have also set the
agenda for current evangelical thought and redefined how many conservative
Christians see the world and their role in it.
For example, most Christians once
held that an abundant life is one of proper belief and orthodox religious
practice, so they looked to books of doctrine and biblical commentary for
guidance. Then Jeannette Oke’s novel Love Came Softly dared to reimagine
“spiritual fullness as falling in love, and feeling safe, and knowing someone
has the best plans for you” (32). It marked a watershed.
Oke’s novel convinced readers that
the Christian life is not a solitary intellectual experience, but a relational odyssey
with God and those who love us. In the tidal wave of
Christian romances that followed, we saw that God can give a
believer more than a correct belief system. The pleasure, personal fulfillment,
and joy of a romantic relationship are equally important gifts of divine love.
Silliman shows that blockbuster
Christian novels have also had a significant impact on evangelical philosophy
and doctrine. Crossway Books produced apologetic volumes by Francis Schaeffer,
C. Everett Koop, and others who argued that the Religious Right was
Christianity’s last bastion against secular humanism. But these books appealed
primarily to intellectuals and the discussion of secular humanism was primarily
an effete topic. Then Frank Paretti’s novel This Present Darkness
catapulted it into the public square.
Another example: Only a few
Christians believed dispensational teachings about a global Tribulation and an
endtime Rapture of faithful believers until the Left Behind novel series
was published. These doctrines were then embraced by many evangelical Christians
who had not given much thought to the Bible’s endtime teachings until then.
I believe we can find instructive
insights in Silliman’s book. I most appreciated his bios of the authors, which
reveal how they came to write these landmark books. Nearly all of them were
first-time authors who wrote their books to draw readers into a more meaningful
understanding of the Bible or to reexamine their own relationship with God, as William
Paul Young did with The Shack.
Another vital subtheme of the book is the current realignment of the evangelical book pubishing industry. Silliman mourns the loss of Christian bookstores as "discourse communities" where such theological ideas can be discussed and compared. They are fast disappearing along with other brick-and-mortar bookstores. Silliman describes how Christian publishers viewed these blockbuster books with suspicion, then delight and amazement as they racked up sales in the tens of millions of copies. But as bookstores disappear, the cost of marketing books skyrocket and profit margins plummet, so publishers are slashing their plans and merging to survive. For these reasons, the whole landscape of Christian publishing is changing dramatically.
He concludes with two
criticisms of these five blockbuster novels:
· “The novels promoted individualism, first of
all. In Oke’s romance novel, the heroine flourished when she realized God’s
love for her…[However,] that woman was never asked to imagine how her abundance
related to her neighbor’s needs, or how her fullness and flourishing were bound
up with that of other people” (190).
· “The best-selling fiction, second, encouraged readers to oppose pluralism. Pluralism is imagined as the cause of cultural upheaval, and readers are asked again and again to imagine how upsetting difference is. In Left Behind, it is pluralism that prompts crisis.…The novel asks readers…to imagine feeling attacked and imagine defending themselves. Every encounter with difference is presented as a site of struggle” (191).
Fair or not? Constructive or
not? Most important: How does our work look in light of Silliman's critique?
While I would love to respond quickly with something off the top of my head, this post requires some deep thinking and taking time to mull over serious issues in our culture. I hope all of us who read this will take it to the Lord and listen for His response regarding the purpose of our own work.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Linda. Daniel Silliman is a respected journalist in the evangelical community, so we should take his book seriously even if we disagree with some of his conclusions.
ReplyDelete